Those are great numbers! I'm hoping this update for our cars will give us some better MPG and ECO numbers. I'm in the 300 range fro my ECO score and 9200 miles.I am at eco 89 with about 1300 miles on my 13. Indicated 39.5 mpg with about 90 to empty before filling up for the 3rd time.
My 11 had 471 when I sold it with 18474 miles on it. This one is so much better. No difference in driving style. The 13 comes on and stays in EV much more often and much longer in city driving than the 11. Crossing my fingers. I find that the indicated mpg is about 3.5 mpg optimistic.
219 at 7000km=4350 milesI am at eco 89 with about 1300 miles on my 13. Indicated 39.5 mpg with about 90 to empty before filling up for the 3rd time. My 11 had 471 when I sold it with 18474 miles on it. This one is so much better. No difference in driving style. The 13 comes on and stays in EV much more often and much longer in city driving than the 11. Crossing my fingers. I find that the indicated mpg is about 3.5 mpg optimistic.
Edit:
Correction (after I jumped in the car this morning) Eco is 90 with 1473 miles (still OK and much better than the 2011).
I just have this niggly feeling that these Eco numbers are about "feel good" and are not based in reality. After the poor mileage I had on my 2011 and what appears to be much better numbers right of out the box on the 2013, I guess I am a little skeptical. Don't look a gift horse (which I paid for btw) in the mouth, right?
The only number that really matters to me is the hand calculated mpg at the time of fill up and of course the distance to empty being accurate.![]()
Other than what appears to be much better mileage (my main reason for trading) they are very similar. On the 2011 I had the jerkiness on cold start during cold weather. None so far with the 2013, but to compare I will probably have to wait for cold weather, which has not occurred since owning the 2013.219 at 7000km=4350 miles
so remltr, you had a 2011 hybrid & you traded it in for a 2013?? how do they compare?